Plant scientists once considered liverwort the most primitive existing plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Land plants arose earlier than thought—and may have had a bigger impact on the evolution of animals By Elizabeth Pennisi Feb.
Search Share Finn Miller, a toddler born with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, due to abnormal "imprinting" of genes, plays at home with his mother and older brother.
Their skin stretched over jutting cheekbones; toddlers might weigh what a healthy 6-month-old would. Back in the mids, when Madeleine Harbison was in medical school, her mentor, a pediatric endocrinologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, urged her to consider what was stunting their growth.
Silver-Russell syndrome had a genetic component, but the twins suggested that it wasn't a conventional hereditary disease, as identical twins carry carbon copies of each other's DNA. So what was it? Harbison finished her training in pediatric endocrinology. She worked alone, sometimes corresponding with Crawford, prescribing growth hormones, appetite stimulants, and other medications.
That was especially true in those early days as her therapeutic blueprint took shape. Harbison was unaware that an ocean away, a doctor in Paris had his own medical mystery: Babies with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome were born unusually large, often with oversized body parts.
They were also vulnerable to childhood cancers of the kidney and liver.
Like Silver-Russell, this syndrome operated outside the rules of Mendelian disorders like cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, Tay-Sachs, and others that result when parents harbor an abnormal genetic sequence and pass it along to their offspring. It would be years before scientists could read the instruction manuals for Silver-Russell and Beckwith-Wiedemann.
Driven by advances in DNA analysis, they found that these two syndromes, along with several others, are imprinting disorders. They arise in a unique subset of genes in which, after conception, the DNA in the embryo that came from the mother is expressed differently than the DNA from the father.
The last several years have seen imprinting disorders emerge from the shadows, and with them a deeper appreciation for the human genome's ability to modulate gene expression in the earliest stages of development. After decades of anecdotes and experimentation, Harbison's treatment for Silver-Russell is finally being tested in a clinical trial.
An international registry is enrolling hundreds of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann and banking their tissue for further study. In the lab, scientists are probing the genetics of their patients and trying to link those findings to a child's health. Delving into imprinting is also yielding insights into the scaffolding of the genome, and the ways in which parents put a stamp on gene expression, influencing health and disease in their children.
Studying these rare diseases "can open a new way to understand the imprinting phenomenon, to see how, in the beginning of the development of the embryo, the embryo answers to stimuli" that regulate how its genes behave, says Giovanni Battista Ferrero, a pediatrician at the University of Turin in Italy.
Imprinting, many scientists believe, reflects competition between a mother's interests and a father's when it comes to gestating the offspring. A mother wants a fetus that doesn't grow too big, so she can survive the pregnancy. A father wants the opposite: Essentially, imprinting means that in some places along the human genome—about genes in all—the way DNA behaves depends on which parent passes it to the offspring.
The jockeying plays out at a molecular level in all of us soon after conception. Some of the genes in sperm and egg cells have chemicals called methyl molecules that attach to them, a process called methylation; these molecules can either activate or silence a gene when the sperm and egg DNA unite in an embryo.Like DNA analysis, the analysis of controlled substances is a mature forensic science discipline and one of the areas with strong scientific underpinnings developed along the lines of classical.
What's more, preliminary analysis of the mitochondrial DNA from the toe bone suggests that it belonged not to a Denisovan but to a Neandertal. That means both types of archaic humans lived in the same cave. Jul 29, · To solve the mystery of her identity, she needed more help than any DNA testing company could offer.
After all, genetic testing gives you the what, but not the why. May 07, · The recent analysis puts an end to the controversial theory that the tomb first belonged to long-lost Queen Nefertiti, who's believed to be Tutankhamun's stepmother, aunt and mother-in-law.
Darwinism and its Mongoloid Mutations Refuted. 0 stars. Register to vote! Published On May 26, Mystery Science Theater Time Lords from Planet X 5,,, as well as the so-called common ancestor “Tree of Life.” (As we will see, DNA is not a basis for Darwinian theory at all – .
An analysis of the corpse’s chemical composition suggested that he was born and lived his entire life in the Tyrol area where his body was found.
Now they’re delving deeper to .